AMCoR Asahikawa Medical College
HOME
|

AMCoR:Asahikawa Medical University Collection and Research (旭川医科大学学術成果リポジトリ)は、本学で生産された電子的な知的生産物(学術雑誌論文の原稿・教材・学術資料など)を保存し、原則的に無償で発信するためのインターネット上の保管庫です。

※AMCoRに収録された学術論文のほとんどは、商業出版社や学会出版社の学術雑誌に掲載されたものですが、著作権に係わる出版社の方針により、出版社の条件に添った版を収録しています。そのため実際の誌面とはレイアウトの相違や、字句校正による文言の違いがあり得ますことをあらかじめご了承ください。


| ホーム ニュース ログイン |

Language

AMCoR検索
  
     詳細検索

インデックスツリー

詳細



閲覧数:833
ID 26874132
アイテムタイプ Article
このアイテムを表示する
本文 26871432.pdf
Type : application/pdf Download
Size : 2.0 MB
Last updated : Sep 12, 2017
Downloads : 972

Total downloads since Sep 12, 2017 : 972
タイトル Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Three Rapid Tests for the Serodiagnosis of Hepatic Cystic Echinococcosis in Humans.
著者
Francesca, Tamarozzi
Ilaria, Covini
Mara, Mariconti
Roberta, Narra
Carmine, Tinelli
Annalisa, De Silvestri
Federica, Manzoni
Adriano, Casulli
伊藤, 亮 (Ito, Akira)
Andreas, Neumayr
Enrico, Brunetti
上位タイトル
PLoS neglected tropical diseases Vol.10, No.2  (2016. 2) ,p.e0004444-
識別番号
その他
PMID:26871432
抄録 BACKGROUND:

The diagnosis of cystic echinococcosis (CE) is based primarily on imaging, in particular with ultrasound for abdominal CE, complemented by serology when imaging results are unclear. In rural endemic areas, where expertise in ultrasound may be scant and conventional serology techniques are unavailable due to lack of laboratory equipment, Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs) are appealing.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:

We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of 3 commercial RDTs for the diagnosis of hepatic CE. Sera from 59 patients with single hepatic CE cysts in well-defined ultrasound stages (gold standard) and 25 patients with non-parasitic cysts were analyzed by RDTs VIRapid HYDATIDOSIS (Vircell, Spain), Echinococcus DIGFA (Unibiotest, China), ADAMU-CE (ICST, Japan), and by RIDASCREEN Echinococcus IgG ELISA (R-Biopharm, Germany). Sensitivity, specificity and ROC curves were compared with McNemar and t-test. For VIRapid and DIGFA, correlation between semiquantitative results and ELISA OD values were evaluated by Spearman's coefficient. Reproducibility was assessed on 16 randomly selected sera with Cohen's Kappa coefficient. Sensitivity and Specificity of VIRapid (74%, 96%) and ADAMU-CE (57%, 100%) did not differ from ELISA (69%, 96%) while DIGFA (72%, 72%) did (p = 0.045). ADAMU-CE was significantly less sensitive in the diagnosis of active cysts (p = 0.019) while DIGFA was significantly less specific (p = 0.014) compared to ELISA. All tests were poorly sensitive in diagnosing inactive cysts (33.3% ELISA and ADAMU-CE, 42.8% DIGFA, 47.6% VIRapid). The reproducibility of all RDTs was good-very good. Band intensity of VIRapid and DIGFA correlated with ELISA OD values (r = 0.76 and r = 0.79 respectively, p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE:

RDTs may be useful in resource-poor settings to complement ultrasound diagnosis of CE in uncertain cases. VIRapid test appears to perform best among the examined kits, but all tests are poorly sensitive in the presence of inactive cysts, which may pose problems with accurate diagnosis.
注記 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
言語
eng
資源タイプ text
ジャンル Journal Article
著者版フラグ publisher
Index
/ Public
/ Public / 国外雑誌論文
関連アイテム